Legal Opinion

Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 7, 1937No. Patent Appeal 3813PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is a trade-mark opposition proceeding in which appellee (hereinafter referred to as opposer) opposes the application of appellant for registration of the word “Needleized” as a trade-mark for cotton piece goods. It comes to us by appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining the opposition and denying the registration.

In its notice of opposition opposer plead its ownership, registration, and use.of the word “Needle-Thrift” for “cotton piece goods — namely, muslin, cambric, long-cloth and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. John Wood Mfg. Co. v. Servel, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Throwing Company, Inc. v. Famous Bathrobe Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. D. J. Bielzoff Products Co. v. White Horse Distillers, Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  3. Master, Wardens, Searchers, Assistants and Commonalty of Co. Of Cutlers in Hallamshire, York County v. Cribben & Sexton CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. The May Department Stores Company v. Kenya CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Englander v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API