Legal Opinion

Griffin v. McBrayer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1960No. 94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The appeal presents this question: Is an unsatisfied judgment against a servant or a partner a bar to another action against the master or the other partner based on the tortious conduct alleged in the prior action? The answer is succinctly stated in Thompson v. Lassiter, 246 N.C. 34, 97 S.E. 2d 492. Denny, J., said: “. . . where the doctrine of respondeat superior is or may be invoked, the injured party may sue the agent or servant alone, and if a judgment is obtained against the agent or servant andi such judgment is not satisfied, the injured party may bring an action against the principal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowell Staats Mining Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Fate v. DixonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API