Legal Opinion

Fate v. Dixon

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1986No. 85-1638-CRTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BRITT, Chief Judge.

On 25 September 1986 Magistrate Alexander B. Denson filed his memorandum and recommendation with regard to the motion by defendants for summary judgment. Both plaintiff and defendants have filed objections to the recommendation, and the matter is now before the court for ruling.

A de novo review of the record convinces the court that the well-reasoned recommendation of Magistrate Denson is, in all respects, in accordance with law. Therefore, the objections are overruled and the court adopts the recommendations of Magistrate Denson, which are incorporated herein by…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wall v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1990
  2. Faber v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. HardingOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API