Heckendorf v. J. C. Penney Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The single issue presented by this appeal is whether a swinging door comprising part of the entrance to a store building is unsafe within the meaning of the safe-place statute (sec. 101.06, Stats.) because of the failure to equip it with available safety devices or safeguards. We assume for the purpose of this decision that Karen was a “frequenter” within the meaning of this statute, inasmuch as she was accompanying her parents who were entering a store that offered for sale merchandise that might be bought by her father for the family.
This court takes judicial notice that it is common…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powless v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Hammontree v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Raim v. VenturaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Dolan v. Callender, McAuslan & Troup Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Carr v. Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- McGuire v. Stein's Gift & Garden Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Frederick v. Hotel Investments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.