Legal Opinion

Heckendorf v. J. C. Penney Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The single issue presented by this appeal is whether a swinging door comprising part of the entrance to a store building is unsafe within the meaning of the safe-place statute (sec. 101.06, Stats.) because of the failure to equip it with available safety devices or safeguards. We assume for the purpose of this decision that Karen was a “frequenter” within the meaning of this statute, inasmuch as she was accompanying her parents who were entering a store that offered for sale merchandise that might be bought by her father for the family.

This court takes judicial notice that it is common…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powless v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hammontree v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Raim v. VenturaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Dolan v. Callender, McAuslan & Troup Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Carr v. Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. McGuire v. Stein's Gift & Garden Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Frederick v. Hotel Investments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API