Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Frame
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 8, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The petitioning attorneys seek to have tbeir compensation fixed and payment directed out of the fund now payable to the assignee of their former client, Pemberton Frame. They invoked alternative forms of relief (1) under section 231-a of the Surrogate's Court Act and (2) for a determination as to the amount of their lien for services under section 475 of the Judiciary Law.
The estate from the year 1925 had been subjected to complicated and protracted litigation. The petitioners represented Pemberton Frame in the contested proceedings up to the year 1929. In March and April of that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- In re AlbrechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re the Estate of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
- In re the Estate of WinburnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In Re Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of ZieglerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Accounting of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
- In re the Estate of HurewitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of PovlsenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
- In re the Estate of MerzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.