Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 2009No. 178PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*517OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
We are asked to determine whether respondent’s exercise of its power of eminent domain to acquire petitioners’ properties for purposes of the proposed land use improvement project, known as Atlantic Yards, would be in conformity with certain provisions of our State Constitution. We answer in the affirmative.
On December 8, 2006, respondent Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) issued a determination pursuant to Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL) § 204, finding that it should use its eminent domain power to take certain privately owned properties…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Goel v. Bunge, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. EitaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Malay v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Reed v. Medford Fire Department, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.