Legal Opinion

People v. Meitz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 6, 1981No. 80-478PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen

The defendant, Michael Meitz, was charged by information with auto theft in violation of section 16 — 1(a) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1(a)). The defendant filed a pre-trial motion to suppress. After a hearing, the motion was denied. At a bench trial, the parties stipulated that the case would be tried on the evidence adduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress, and the stipulated testimony of the owner of the stolen auto. The defendant was found guilty as charged. The defendant appeals the denial of the motion to suppress. Defendant did not file…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Galberth v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. RoweAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. State v. ParmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  5. People v. KelleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API