Legal Opinion

Food House, Inc. v. Coble, SEC. of Revenue

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1976No. 71PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

This action presents two questions for decision. The first question is whether the sales of frozen concentrated orange juice herein involved are properly taxable under the provisions of the North Carolina Soft Drink Tax Act, G.S. 105-113.41 et seq. (1969). If this be so, the second question is whether said Act, on its face, or as interpreted and applied by the Secretary of Revenue to these sales, violates the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by Article I, Section 19 of the North Carolina Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Taylor v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Broadwell Realty Corp. v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Aronov v. Secretary of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API