Skeen v. Peterson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Justice.
Appeal by the plaintiff from a verdict and judgment of no cause of action in a suit by plaintiff against defendant to recover attorney’s fees, and from a judgment of $500 in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim. The parties are referred to as they appeared in the court below. The facts, insofar as material here, are as follows:
The plaintiff is an attorney at law, regularly admitted to practice before the courts of this state. He is engaged in a general law practice, and maintains his office in Salt Lake City, Utah.
At some time prior to August 8,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Moore v. Rochester Weaver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Case of Torr's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
- Orwig v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Rizzi v. FanelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Freedman v. Horton, Schwartz & PerseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Dunn v. McKay, Burton, McMurray & ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Dunn v. McKay, Burton, McMurray & ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.