Legal Opinion

Board of Park Commissioners v. Bremner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1934No. 29,536PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

On this motion appellant states that we were under a misapprehension as to its having abandoned its contention that its railroad property was not assessable for benefits on account of the improvements of block 20. We therefore proceed to the consideration of that point. It is appellant's claim that the railroad use to which the railroad property is subjected is the most valuable use to which it can be put, and that because its value is not enhanced for railroad purposes by the improvement of block 20 it cannot be said to be benefited notwithstanding the improvement may enhance its value for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Hughes v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. In re Improvement of Lake of the Isles ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Wabash Ry. Co. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Park Commissioners v. BremnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API