Legal Opinion

Rohlfs v. Township of Fairgrove

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1913No. Docket No. 64PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Tuscola; Beach, J. Case by Diedrich H. Rohks against the township of Fairgrove for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteers, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have resulted from an accident occasioned by a defective highway in the defendant township of Fairgrove.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the circuit court of Tuscola county, and defendant has removed the proceedings to this court for review, chiefly upon the ground that the undisputed testimony clearly establishes, as a matter of law, that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, and a verdict should therefore have been directed for defendant.

It is conceded by defendant’s counsel that plaintiff’s testimony…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vergin v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Grandorf v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Conrad v. Upper Augusta TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Michigan Racing Assoc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Burchard v. Otis Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sullivan v. Detroit & Windsor Ferry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Corfeld v. Douglas Houghton Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Lake v. TOWNSHIP of SpringvilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API