Legal Opinion

Jones v. Michigan Racing Assoc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1956No. Docket 13, Calendar 46,735PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dethmers, C. *J.

Prom judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant the plaintiff appeals. His suit was for damages resulting from injuries sustained in an accidental fall while a “business invitee” on defendant’s premises.

Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiff, pertinent facts are: Plaintiff entered upon defendant’s race-track property and went to a concrete paved area beneath the grandstand; he stood there for 10 or 20 minutes on a dry place; it was raining, water was blown in through the entrance way and puddles of water formed on the concrete; he decided to leave…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Garrett v. W. S. Butterfield Theatres, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Bedell v. BerkeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clifford Gowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Nash v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Perry v. Hazel Park Harness RacewayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Carreras v. Honeggers & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API