Legal Opinion

Carden v. Carden

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1959No. Civ. 9369PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This action was brought by Amaryllis L. Carden, hereinafter called “Amaryllis,” against Morris Carden, hereinafter called “Morris,” to obtain a decree that whatever apparent interest Morris had in certain real property he held in trust for Amaryllis. Morris cross-complained, asking that it be decreed he was the owner of one-half interest in the property and that Amaryllis should account to him for its use. The trial court decreed that Amaryllis was the sole owner of the property and from that judgment Morris appeals.

On January 6, 1934, R. B. Carden, hereinafter called “Robert,” and appellant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wiltsee v. UtleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hunter v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Cerro de Alcala Homeowners Ass'n v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985
  4. George v. TannerIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. George v. TannerIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API