Schmidt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARBIERI, Senior Judge.
Harold Schmidt (claimant) seeks review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) issued pursuant to The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1 wherein the board affirmed a referee’s award of total disability benefits from December 2, 1987 through October 31, 1988 and partial disability benefits beginning November 1, 1988 and continuing indefinitely. We will affirm in part and reverse in part.
The only issue before us is whether claimant, through his testimony at the hearing held by the referee on November 1,1988, voluntarily removed himself from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- FMC Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- McAfee v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Southeastern Pa. Transp. Auth. v. WCABSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.