Legal Opinion

Medlock v. University Health Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2012-213462; Nos. 27265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This Court granted the petition of Dana Allison Medlock (Petitioner) in its Original Jurisdiction to determine whether a non-attorney who files a claim and petition for allowance of a claim in probate court on behalf of a business entity is engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. We dispense with further briefing and hold that a non-attorney may present claims against an estate and petition for allowance of *27claims in the probate court on behalf of a business entity without engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.

Petitioner is the personal representative of the Medlock Estate. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Daniel, At. Gen. v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Doe v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Brown v. CoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Renaissance Enterprises, Inc. v. Summit Teleservices, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rogers Townsend & Thomas, PC v. PeckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. U.S. Bank National Association v. Frances L. MackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025
  3. Westbrook v. Murkin GroupSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API