Legal Opinion

Sprewell v. Golden State Warriors

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2001No. Nos. 99-15602, 99-17186PublishedCited by 472 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed September 14, 2001, is amended as follows:

At Slip Op. 13304-13305 [266 F.3d 979, 989], in the sentence which begins “The arbitration award effectively and persuasively fleshes out the fact ... ”, delete the portion of the sentence that reads, “The arbitration award effectively and persuasively fleshes out the fact that the actions taken by the NBA and the Warriors were motivated solely by Sprewell’s misconduct and were not, as Sprewell states,” and substitute “The uncontested facts set forth in the arbitration award effectively and persuasively rebut the conclusory…

2Cited by472 opinions

  1. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  3. Marsh v. San Diego CountyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2006
  4. In Re Calpine Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  5. Stickrath v. Globalstar, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007

467 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API