Legal Opinion
State v. Morrissey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 20, 1989No. 6788PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
Having obtained permission from the trial court pursuant to General Statutes § 54-96, the state has appealed from a judgment of dismissal rendered after the trial court had granted the defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence.1
On or about January 9,1987, members of the Bristol police department searched the defendant’s apartment under the authority of a search warrant. The search warrant was based on an affidavit that was prepared by two police officers who had had considerable training and experience in the field of narcotics enforcement. The affidavit contained the following…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. DuntzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Franko v. BronsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. BartonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.