Legal Opinion
State v. Duntz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1992No. 13990PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether three searches of the defendant’s apartment *209and van were constitutionally reasonable pursuant to article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution. Following a trial, the defendant, Richard Duntz, was convicted by a jury of the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a)1 in connection with the killing of Earl E. Morey II. He was, thereafter, sentenced to a term of imprisonment of sixty years. He has appealed his conviction to this court pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199 (b). We reverse the judgment of the trial court…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.