Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 12, 1990No. 7401; 7405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The defendants appeal from their convictions, after a jury trial, of possession of heroin in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a) and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes § 21a-267 (a). They claim that the trial court should have granted their motion to suppress.

On April 2, 1987, Waterbury police received information from a known confidential informant that “cocaine and heroin were being sold from the defendants’ apartment.” The police then set up a controlled buy. They searched the informant, gave him $30 and observed him enter the defendants’ apartment…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API