State v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The defendants appeal from their convictions, after a jury trial, of possession of heroin in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a) and possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of General Statutes § 21a-267 (a). They claim that the trial court should have granted their motion to suppress.
On April 2, 1987, Waterbury police received information from a known confidential informant that “cocaine and heroin were being sold from the defendants’ apartment.” The police then set up a controlled buy. They searched the informant, gave him $30 and observed him enter the defendants’ apartment…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990