Legal Opinion
McLaney v. Fortune Operating Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1968No. 5459PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Collins, L:
This appeal is from a judgment entered by the court below in which three cases were consolidated for trial. We conclude the judgment to be in error, reverse it and remand the consolidated actions for a new trial in accordance with this decision.
The three cases below are:
Case No. A 15523 a suit by Harold C. Springston against Fortune Operating Co., Inc. for $35,000, the balance due upon a promissory note;
Case No. A 17657 a suit by Springston in a representative capacity pursuant to NRCP 23(a) on behalf of himself and other creditors seeking a judgment for damages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robinson v. WangemannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Solorza v. Park Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Clark v. London Assurance Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921
- Ryan v. LandisNevada Supreme Court · 1938
- Brecht Co. v. RobinowitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lopez v. Merit InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- United Independent Insurance Agencies v. Bank of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1986