Legal Opinion
Breznikar v. T. J. Topper Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 8, 1941No. Civ. 11511PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding the plaintiffs $4000 as damages for a malicious tort. The action was tried before the court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiffs and the appeal is from the judgment entered on those findings. It is the second appeal. (Breznikar v. T. J. Topper Co., 23 Cal. App. (2d) 298 [72 Pac. (2d) 895].) In the cited ease the facts showing the wrongful acts of the defendants are fully set forth and need not be repeated. As shown by said decision the first judgment was reversed and the cause was remanded to retry the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Union Hollywood Water Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kirstein v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Breznikar v. T.J. Topper Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Alldred's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Melvin v. PenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Wade v. Markwell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Stroman v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Jones v. KauffmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968