Legal Opinion

Dean v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1990No. 84065, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff seeks workers’ compensation1 benefits for injuries incurred in an automobile accident while traveling from home to her doctor’s office where she was to receive treatment for a prior work-related compensable injury. Nearly half a century ago, in Rucker v Michigan Smelting & Refining Co, 300 Mich 668; 2 NW2d 808 (1942), this Court held that a subsequent injury sustained under similar circumstances was not compensable because it did not arise "out of and in the course of employment” within the meaning of the act.2 In this appeal we are asked to extend workers’ compensation coverage to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Negri v. SlotkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. NikkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. MastersMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Boyd v. W G Wade ShowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ormsby v. Capital Welding, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API