Legal Opinion

Lindgren v. Moore

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 29, 1995No. 94 C 5992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COAR, District Judge.

In February 1994 plaintiffs Richard Lind-gren (“father”), Mark Lindgren (“brother”), and Laura Lindgren (“sister”) filed suit against Janet Moore (“therapist”) and her supervisor, Dr. James Cassens (“supervisor”) alleging various Illinois torts that arose from the psychological treatment of Amy Lindgren (“patient/daughter”). The Complaint lists twenty-seven counts, but in essence there are only five distinct causes of action. All three plaintiffs bring the following counts against both defendants: Malpractice (Counts I, VI, VIII, XIII, XIX,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Corgan v. MuehlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doe v. McKayIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Russell v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Tuman v. Genesis AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Doe v. McKayIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Doe v. McKayIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API