Legal Opinion

Falkner v. Protective Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1934No. 6 Div. 448PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action by the payee against an irregular indorser of a promissory note. The question is the sufficiency of the complaint as tested by demurrer.

It is first urged that it is insufficient because it does not state the maturity of the note. But there seems to be a rule of pleading in that respect that, when the complaint does not allege when the note matured, but simply avers that on a certain day one executed a note by which he promised to pay plaintiff a certain sum, it will be construed to mean that no day was fixed for its payment, and therefore it was due on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. McDougald's Adm'r v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Carter v. Long Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Bolling & Son v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Shows v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Jackson v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Jefferson County v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Ingalls Iron Works Co. v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Pointer v. Farmers' Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API