Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. Maples

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1953No. 8 Div. 12Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

In their brief in support of appellant’s, application for rehearing counsel for appellant contend that we erroneously refused to consider certain assignments of error-on the basis of their being grouped for argument with other assignments which we concluded were without merit.

Counsel contend that the grouped assignments involved the same or similar propositions of law, and were therefore grouped for argument and should be considered as though separately presented. See The First National Bank of Montgomery v. Sheehan, 220 Ala. 524, 126 So. 409; Southern Ry. Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Lambert v. JeffersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Brasher v. BrombergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API