Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We must decide in this case the appropriate sanction for a lawyer who, in an overzealous attempt to achieve what he believed to be his clients’ wishes, disregarded professional standards for executing wills, powers of attorney, and deeds. Finding that the lawyer violated the Code of Professional Responsibility, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has recommended that we suspend the lawyer’s license to practice for six months but conditionally stay the suspension. We agree that the lawyer committed professional misconduct as found by the board; however, to safeguard…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Counsel v. AgopianOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RohrerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Groveport Madison Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017