Legal Opinion

Singewald v. Girden

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 1, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, Vice Chancellor:

Defendant has raised certain legal *53objections to the complaint of plaintiff. Plaintiff, in turn, has moved to have the sufficiency of these objections determined. The points for determination are:

1. That there is a substantial dispute as to the title of the property on which the house of the defendant is situate and that therefore this court should not take jurisdiction until that issue has been determined;

2. That this action is a public action and that Attorney General is therefore a necessary and indispensable party;

3. That the State of Delaware is an indispensable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  4. Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Singewald v. GirdenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  2. Singewald v. GirdenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  3. Singewald v. GirdenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API