Legal Opinion
Singewald v. Girden
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided July 1, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
107 A.2d 231 (1952)
SINGEWALD
v.
GIRDEN et al.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, Sussex.
July 1, 1952.
W. Howard Thompson, of Georgetown, for plaintiff.
Houston Wilson, of Georgetown, for defendant.
BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.
Defendant has raised certain legal objections to the complaint of plaintiff. Plaintiff, in turn, has moved to have the sufficiency of these objections determined. The points for determination are:
1. That there is a substantial dispute as to the title of the property on which the house of the defendant is situate and that therefore this court should not take jurisdiction until that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- New York Trust Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
- Johnson v. Town of WatertownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Singewald v. GirdenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- Singewald v. GirdenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956