Legal Opinion

Kimicata v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 10, 2012No. 1 CA-CV 11-0460PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellant Frances Kimicata timely appeals from a judgment awarding attorneys’ fees to Defendant/Appellee Kate McGee under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-1809(N) (Supp. 2011).1 We hold this statute authorizes an award of attorneys’ fees following a hearing to modify, quash, or continue an injunction under A.R.S. § 12-1809(H). Accordingly, we affirm the award of attorneys’ fees.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In February 2011, Kimicata and McGee obtained separate ex-parte injunctions *7against each other prohibiting harassment. McGee requested a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Brush Wellman, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barton & Associates Incorporated v. TrainorDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  2. McDonald v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API