Kimicata v. McGee
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellant Frances Kimicata timely appeals from a judgment awarding attorneys’ fees to Defendant/Appellee Kate McGee under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-1809(N) (Supp. 2011).1 We hold this statute authorizes an award of attorneys’ fees following a hearing to modify, quash, or continue an injunction under A.R.S. § 12-1809(H). Accordingly, we affirm the award of attorneys’ fees.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In February 2011, Kimicata and McGee obtained separate ex-parte injunctions *7against each other prohibiting harassment. McGee requested a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Brush Wellman, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barton & Associates Incorporated v. TrainorDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- McDonald v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022