Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Eugene Dupas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 2005No. 04-50055PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Matthew Eugene Dupas appeals the sentence imposed after his conviction for possessing stolen mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. 1 The government concedes that Defendant’s sentence of imprisonment may be remanded to the district court pursuant to our decision in United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc), because that sentence rested on the district court’s finding of fact as to the amount of loss and was imposed according to the then-mandatory United States Sentencing Guidelines. Here, we address two other challenges to Defendant’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Derek A. Vaughn, Zaza Leslie LindoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. David L. Smith, United States of America v. Herbert A. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Alston-Graves, LoisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API