Legal Opinion

Miner v. City of Vernonia

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 28, 1980No. 23852, CA 16096PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

The City of Vernonia appeals a summary judgment in favor of third-party defendant State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF). The issue is whether SAIF is required to provide compensation to plaintiff for injuries sustained while working as a volunteer fireman for the city. Plaintiff obtained a judgment against the city which is not appealed. The appeal involves a question of law. The facts respecting SAIF’s alleged liability are undisputed.

Plaintiff suffered a myocardial infarction in April, 1977, while performing services as a volunteer fireman for the defendant City of Vernonia. Prior thereto,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Smith v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Earls v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Holden v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Matter of Compensation of BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. HermannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Westfall v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API