Memmott v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is an action by an injured employe seeking coverage under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (ORS 656.002 to 656.590).
His employer had neither applied for nor rejected coverage, but this fact would not affect the right of the workman to recover if the employer should be found to have been engaged in a hazardous occupation. ORS 656.026. The jury found for the plaintiff but the trial court entered judgment n.o.v. for the State Industrial Accident Commission. The plaintiff appeals.
The essential facts are as follows:
Plaintiff was hired by one Kronberg as a handy man and caretaker for a motel.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oregon Farm Bureau v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Bennett v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Bartley v. DohertyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Parks v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Manning v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richert v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1965