Bartley v. Doherty
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
Plaintiff-respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal. Plaintiff challenges the sufficiency of the service of the notice of appeal on plaintiff. The determination *16of the motion requires the interpretation of the statutes specifying the manner in which the notice shall be served. The question is one of importance to the profession.
It is known, of course, that the 1959 legislative assembly made material changes in the statutes regulating appeals. Prior to January 1, 1960, the effective date of the amendment to the statute in question, the statute which governed the service of the notice of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Skeeters v. SkeetersOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Parks v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Quick v. AndresenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Richey v. SumogeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1967
- Memmott v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.