Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Winona Interurban Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1914No. 8,391PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Miami Circuit Court; Joseph N. Tillett, Judge. Action by Edward A. Meyers against the Winona Interurban Railway Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

*5181. *517Appellant sued appellee to recover damages for personal injuries to himself and for the destruction of his automobile caused by a collision between such automobile and one of appellee’s cars at a public crossing in the city of Peru, Indiana. The issues of fact were presented by a complaint in four paragraphs and an answer in general denial. The third paragraph of complaint was withdrawn and a trial by jury on the remaining paragraphs resulted in a general verdict in favor of appellant for $860. With the general verdict, the jury returned answers to interrogatories submitted to it.- Over…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Peru Heating Co. v. LenhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Jeffersonville Manufacturing Co. v. HoldenIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. SpiegelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Evansville & Southern Indiana Traction Co v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. LoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. WalshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Baker v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Marshall v. WymondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McConkeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API