Jeffersonville Manufacturing Co. v. Holden
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Floyd Circuit Court; William C. Utz, Judge. Action by Thomas A. Holden against the Jeffersonville Manufacturing Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, C. J.
Appellee recovered judgment for two thousand dollars in the court below in an action against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him by reason of the alleged violation of §8029 Bums 1908, Acts 1899 p. 231, generally known as the factory act.
1
In prosecuting an appeal to this court appellant seeks to have §§8021-8047 Burns 1908, Acts 1899 p. 231, declared “unconstitutional, void and invalid” and particularly insists that §8029, supra, is invalid for uncertainty, in that the language thereof makes it the duty of the owner, his agent, superintendent or other person in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Indiana Railway Co. v. MaurerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vandalia Railroad v. StillwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Citizens Telephone Co. v. PrickettIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Illinois Steel Company v. FullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Belchak v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Public Utilities Co. v. HandorfIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.