Legal Opinion
American Society of Consultant Pharmacists v. Concannon
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 19, 2002No. 2:02-cv-00115PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SINGAL, District Judge.
An organization representing pharmacists sued the Maine Department of Human Services (DHS), alleging that DHS violated federal Medicaid law and state administrative procedure when it imposed an emergency rule reducing reimbursement rates for prescription drugs. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket # 13). Having held an evidentiary hearing August 6, 2002, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, and DENIES the Motion.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
On July 1, 2002,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Long Term Care Pharmacy Alliance v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Clark v. RichmanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- In Re NYAHSA LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center v. ShewryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- RF Technologies Corp. v. Applied Microwave Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.