Husted v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis
delivered the opinion of the court.. Plaintiff-appellant herein asserts that he has appealed from the order entered denying his post-trial motion for new trial against defendants-appellees, Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co., a Missouri Corporation, and Enos Conley & Sons. However, his’ abstract of record fails to sustain this contention.
The plaintiff’s amended complaint consisted of three counts. Count I was directed against the defendant, Roy Diedrick, a custom farmer, who applied the chemical spray in question to 110 acres of plaintiff’s corn.
Count II alleged that Diedrick purchased the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harris v. AnnunzioIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Lukas v. LukasIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Gribben v. Interstate Motor Freight System Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Rubinstein v. Fred A. Coleman Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Department of Finance v. BodeIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Martin v. Orvis Bros. & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Denenberg v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Shaw v. KronstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- People v. RockettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.