Legal Opinion

Department of Finance v. Bode

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1941No. 26085. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

The Department of Finance began an action in the municipal court of Chicago against Ludwig Bode, the appellant. The abstract filed by appellant does not set forth the substance of appellee’s statement of claim or the nature of appellee’s demands. It does show appellant filed a motion to strike the statement of claim and dismiss the suit and sets forth the first, second and sixth paragraphs of the motion. In the first paragraph of the motion it is stated that appellee’s claim is based upon the provisions of the Retailers’ Occupation Tax act and it is alleged the act is unconstitutional in that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gyure v. Sloan Valve Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Clinton v. Drainage Commissioners of Drainage District No. 7Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hooper v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Morris v. KrejciIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Husted v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Goodman v. Motor Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Department of Finance v. SheldonIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hayes v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People Ex Rel. McWard v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API