Legal Opinion

Pabst v. Hesse

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1970No. 41873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether before his death the insured under a life insurance policy had effectively changed the beneficiary. The parties to the action are the two persons claiming to be that beneficiary: Defendant, Howard O. Hesse, the insured’s father, who was originally named in the policy, and plaintiff, Susan Lynn Pabst, formerly Susan Lynn Hesse, the widow of the insured and the alleged substitute.

After a trial to the court, judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

On November 1,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brajovich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Brown v. AginSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Boehne v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. Crespo MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
  2. Lemke v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. BundeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State Farm Life Insurance Company v. YoungsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API