Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Bunde

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1996No. C8-96-1119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Lola Phelps appeals from a grant of summary judgment to respondent Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company denying her claim for life insurance benefits. Appellant argues the district court improperly applied the substitution of beneficiary theory to change the beneficiary on her late husband’s life insurance plan. Because we find the doctrine of substitution of beneficiary unavailable to respondent as a means of avoiding its contractual obligation, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

In June 1989, respondent issued a life insurance policy with a death benefit of $60,000 to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. American Standard Insurance Co. v. LeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Brajovich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Life Insurance Company v. YoungsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  2. State Farm Life Insurance Company v. YoungsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API