Legal Opinion

Sedgwick v. Tucker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 7603PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.

— This was a suit for an injunction. The complaint averred that the plaintiffs, William H. Tucker and Aurilla Tucker, were husband and wife, and the joint owners and tenants by entirety of the undivided seven-eighths parts of certain lands in Shelby county, of which a particular description was given, and which were conveyed to them jointly by William Clark and others, heirs at law of Ephraim Tucker deceased; that in March, 1876, Matthew Sedgwick, as the administrator of the estate of the said Ephraim Tucker, recovered judgment in the Shelby Circuit Court against the plaintiff William H.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parrish v. ThurstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Shockey v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Bidinger v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Brown v. RawlingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Stout v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Weight v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Heap v. ParrishIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API