Legal Opinion

Weight v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1886No. 10,726PublishedCited by 37 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Elliott, J. —

The theory of the appellant’s complaint is that the real property in controversy is subject to seizure upon judgments rendered against the appellee Jesse Jones, and that his title to the property, derived through his deceased wife, Louisa J. Jones, is in fee. The fifth paragraph of the answer of the appellees avers that “ In the year 1840 *18Jesse Jones married Louisa J. Norwood; that at the time of said marriage neither of them had any property or estate; that two children only were born of said marriage, namely, the said Maria, now intermarried with said Foltz, and the said Mary,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Savage v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Carroll v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hays v. RegerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Koons v. MellettIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McCord v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Blair v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API