Legal Opinion

People v. Fournier

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 16, 1990No. 90SA36PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

The People, in this interlocutory appeal, challenge the district court’s suppression of marijuana plants and other items of evidence seized from the residence of the defendant, Mary Louise Fournier, during a search pursuant to a warrant. The district court ruled that the search was invalid because the affidavit for the search warrant was subscribed and sworn to before a court clerk rather than a judge as required by Crim.P. 41(c)(1). We conclude that, although the procedure followed by the issuing judge did not conform to. the literal requirements of Crim.P. 41(c)(1), the issuance of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. People v. ThiretSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. United States v. Christopher GitchoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BurolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. McKinstrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. PoirezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. MartinezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API