Legal Opinion

Bresee v. Dunn

California Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1918No. L. A. No. 4132. Department TwoPublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Judgment followed an order sustaining a general demurrer to the amended complaint. From said judgment plaintiff appeals.

The action was one whereby plaintiff sought to enjoin defendants from constructing a house on their property in alleged violation of a certain building restriction. The complaint avers substantially the following facts:

In October, 1901, Prudential Improvement Company, owner of a block of land in the city of Los Angeles, bounded by West Adams, Anita, Normandie and Twenty-seventh Streets, caused said land to be resubdivided and filed for record a plat showing the division…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Korn v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Allen v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Berryman v. Hotel Savoy CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Los Angeles Terminal Land Co. v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. WelshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. McBride v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wayt v. PateeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API