Legal Opinion

City of Amarillo v. Stockton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1958No. A-6548PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

The City of Amarillo let to S. G. Stockton a contract for the excavation of a trench along and within the street and the laying therein of a sanitary sewer line. During the course of the work by the contractor a cave-in occurred. Johnnie Gray sued the City for damages to his building located on land abutting the street caused, as he asserts, by the loss of lateral support. He alleged that the City’s liability for this damage arose out of the constitutional inhibition that “no person’s property shall be taken or destroyed or applied to public use without adequate compensation being made * *…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. PrescottTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Reynolds v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Dallas County Flood Control District v. BensonTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. PipkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Steele v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Houston v. Renault, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API