Legal Opinion

Government of Sri Lanka v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 17, 2018No. Consol. 17-00059PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Restani, Judge:

In this action challenging a final determination and countervailing duty order issued by the United States Department of Commerce ("Commerce") regarding off-the-road *1375 ("OTR") rubber tires from Sri Lanka, the Government of Sri Lanka ("GSL"), Camso Inc., Camso Loadstar (Private) Ltd., and Camso USA Inc. (collectively "Camso") (all the foregoing, collectively "plaintiffs"), request that the court hold Commerce's countervailing duty determination to be unsupported by substantial record evidence or otherwise not in accordance with the law, and remand this matter accordingly.

BACKGROUN…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Corus Staal BV v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Delverde, Srl and Delverde Usa, Inc. v. United States v. Borden, Inc., Hershey Foods Corp. And Gooch Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber Int'l Trade Investigations or Negot. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  2. Hyundai Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  3. Hyundai Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  4. Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API