Legal Opinion
Chicoine v. Bignall
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1995No. 21320PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to confirm an award in arbitration and denying a motion to vacate the same award.
I
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The respondent, Bliss 0. Bignall, is an attorney who represented the appellants (referred to collectively as Chieoine) in a prior action. Following a trial in that action, a jury awarded damages against Chicoine. Bignall timely filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and later filed a motion for new trial. The motion for JNOV was granted. In O’Neil v. Schuckardt, 112 Idaho 472, 733 P.2d 693…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- O'NEIL v. SchuckardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Bingham County Commission v. Interstate Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Johnson v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Hecla Mining Co. v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Driver v. SI CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- American & Foreign Ins. Co. v. ReichertIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Rita Turner v. Robert TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Reece v. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.