Legal Opinion

Reece v. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 2003No. 28054PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

The Appellant, Ronald Dean Reece, claims the Respondents, Piper Jaffray and its employees as individuals, Gerald Aznoe, a stock broker, and Larry Bull, Branch Manager, made unsolicited trades in his accounts (known as “churning”) and then sold his stock in complete disregard to the Appellant’s explicit instructions. Appellant appealed the denial of his Application to Vacate the Arbitration Award with the district court and the granting of the Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant Ronald Reece…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Omnicare, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wattenbarger v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Barbee v. WMA Securities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mason v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Barbee v. WMA Securities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API