Legal Opinion
Doe v. Cutter Biological
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 19, 1993No. 90-687-CIV-ORL-22PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONWAY, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant Cutter’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment on the Basis that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is Time-Barred (Dkt. 154), filed September 11, 1992. The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff’s response and the materials submitted by both parties in support of their memoranda of law. Because this action is time-barred under applicable Florida law, the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Summary judgment is appropriate only when the Court is satisfied “that there is no genuine issue as to any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Samples v. City Of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- City of Miami v. BrooksSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- James D. Nelson, Jr. v. American National Red Cross, James D. Nelson, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. American National Red CrossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Berrios v. Miles, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Senger Bros. Nursery, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- Troum v. Newark Beth Israel Med. Ctr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Doe v. Miles Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.