Legal Opinion

Frolik v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 1981No. 79-679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

392 So.2d 846 (1981)

Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Attorney General.

(Re: Joel P. FROLIK

v.

STATE of Alabama).

No. 79-679.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 9, 1981.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Samuel J. Clenney, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Charles C. Partin, of Stone, Partin & Granade, Bay Minette, for respondent.

2Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals declaring Code 1975, § 13-6-18 facially overbroad and unconstitutional. We affirm.

The defendant/respondent, Joel P. Frolik, was charged and found guilty of using abusive, insulting or…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donley v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. In the Interest of Joseph T.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Ex Parte SotoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Ex Parte SotoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API